initial commit
This commit is contained in:
16
src/app.html
Normal file
16
src/app.html
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
||||
<html lang="en">
|
||||
<head>
|
||||
<meta charset="utf-8" />
|
||||
<link rel="icon" href="/favicon.png" />
|
||||
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com">
|
||||
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.gstatic.com" crossorigin>
|
||||
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Tajawal:wght@400;500&display=swap" rel="stylesheet">
|
||||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css" />
|
||||
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
|
||||
%svelte.head%
|
||||
</head>
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
<div id="svelte">%svelte.body%</div>
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
</html>
|
1
src/global.d.ts
vendored
Normal file
1
src/global.d.ts
vendored
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
/// <reference types="@sveltejs/kit" />
|
20
src/routes/[slug].svelte
Normal file
20
src/routes/[slug].svelte
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
<script context="module">
|
||||
export async function load({ page }) {
|
||||
let post = await import(`./_posts/${page.params.slug}.svx`);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
props: {
|
||||
metadata: post.metadata,
|
||||
BlogPost: post.default
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
|
||||
<script>
|
||||
export let metadata, BlogPost;
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
|
||||
<div id="post">
|
||||
<h1>{metadata.title}</h1>
|
||||
<svelte:component this={BlogPost} />
|
||||
</div>
|
42
src/routes/__layout.svelte
Normal file
42
src/routes/__layout.svelte
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
:global(main) {
|
||||
max-width: 42rem;
|
||||
margin: 0 auto;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#header {
|
||||
background-color: #4f5f68;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#nav-main {
|
||||
max-width: 30rem;
|
||||
margin: 0 auto;
|
||||
display: grid;
|
||||
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr;
|
||||
column-gap: 40px;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#nav-main a {
|
||||
font-size: 1.5rem;
|
||||
color: white;
|
||||
text-decoration: none;
|
||||
text-align: center;
|
||||
padding: 6px 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#nav-main a:hover {
|
||||
background-color: #00000025;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
|
||||
<div id="header">
|
||||
<nav id="nav-main">
|
||||
<a href="/">Home</a>
|
||||
<a href="/posts">Posts</a>
|
||||
<a href="/about">About</a>
|
||||
</nav>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<main>
|
||||
<slot></slot>
|
||||
</main>
|
25
src/routes/_posts/imagining-a-passwordless-future.svx
Normal file
25
src/routes/_posts/imagining-a-passwordless-future.svx
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Imagining A Passwordless Future
|
||||
description: Can replace passwords with something more user-friendly?
|
||||
date: 2021-04-30
|
||||
---
|
||||
Passwords are the *worst*.
|
||||
|
||||
How many times have you groaned becuase *yet another* password-related thing
|
||||
was messed up? Forgotten passwords, passwords that you're *sure* you wrote
|
||||
down but can't find for some reason, passwords that you definitely *did* make
|
||||
a record of but the site is inexplicably refusing to accept, passwords that
|
||||
get silently truncated because your bank is still using 3DES for some reason,
|
||||
the list goes on. It's constant point of pain for almost everyone, and even
|
||||
after 20+ years of trying to make it work we *still* haven't figured out a
|
||||
foolproof method. Password managers help, but they aren't perfect. How many
|
||||
times have you created a password for a new account somewhere, saved it, and
|
||||
then discovered that your save didn't go through - maybe it didn't meet the
|
||||
requirements (because your 24-character string of gibberish didn't includ a s
|
||||
p e c i a l c h a r a c t e r), or maybe your cable box got hit by
|
||||
lightning just as you clicked Save, or *whatever*. The fact is that passwords
|
||||
are a pain, and it seems to be a pretty intractable problem.
|
||||
|
||||
You know what aren't a pain, or at least not nearly to the same extent? Keys.
|
||||
That's right, physical stick-em-in-a-lock-and-turn metal keys. They've been
|
||||
around since forever, and I doubt they'll be going anywhere any time soon.
|
130
src/routes/_posts/simpler-socketio.svx
Normal file
130
src/routes/_posts/simpler-socketio.svx
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Let's Design A Simpler SocketIO
|
||||
date: 2021-10-16
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
SocketIO is packed with features.
|
||||
But do we really need all of them all the time?
|
||||
---
|
||||
Listen, don't get me wrong. SocketIO is great. It provides tons of features,
|
||||
fantastic platform support, is widely deployed by a hugely diverse set of
|
||||
companies, and has been around long enough that it probably has most of the
|
||||
easily-encountered bugs ironed out.
|
||||
|
||||
So why wouldn't you want to use it? Well, a couple of reasons occur to me.
|
||||
One, it's not exactly small. The unpacked library weighs in at just over 1MB,
|
||||
which isn't a lot if it's a core component of your application (e.g. if
|
||||
you're building a real time chat app) but is a bit much if you're only
|
||||
looking for a small subset of its features.
|
||||
|
||||
Two, it's reasonably complex. Again, not insurmountably so, but complex enough
|
||||
that it probably isn't worth hacking together a basic SocketIO client in your
|
||||
REPL of choice if you just want to test something real quick. And on the
|
||||
server side, it's complex enough that you'll probably want to avoid rolling
|
||||
your own if possible. This becomes especially troublesome if you already have
|
||||
a working application and you just want to sprinkle in a little real-time
|
||||
interactivity, rather than building your whole application around that
|
||||
assumption. In my (admittedly limited) experience, the existing SocketIO
|
||||
integrations don't always play very nicely with the existing server
|
||||
frameworks, although if you stick to the most widely-used stuff you're
|
||||
probably fine.
|
||||
|
||||
And honestly, it's just a lot of complexity to introduce if you just want a
|
||||
simple event stream. You could argue that you don't even need websockets for
|
||||
this - Server Sent Events are a thing, as are simple HTTP requests with a
|
||||
streaming response - but in this day and age, the set of solutions to the
|
||||
problem of "persistent communication between server and client" has pretty
|
||||
firmly coalesed around websockets. They're there, they're supported, there
|
||||
are lots of libraries - you might as well just go with the flow.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ok, so what are you saying?
|
||||
|
||||
Basically, that we need something that's _like_ SocketIO but lighter-weight,
|
||||
and solves a more limited set of problems. Specifically, the problem I'm
|
||||
looking to solve is _event streams_ - given a web service and a client, how
|
||||
does the client detect that _things are happening_ in the background so that
|
||||
it can update itself accordingly?
|
||||
|
||||
The use cases for this are pretty extensive. Most obviously, you can use it to
|
||||
implement a notifications system on pretty much any webapp that
|
||||
involves "users want to know when things happen," which is pretty broad.
|
||||
Maybe you're running an ecommerce shop and you want to notify your customers
|
||||
that the item they've had their eye on is back in stock. Or you've just
|
||||
opened up a new promotion and they should check it out. Maybe you're running
|
||||
a website that displays a stock ticker, and you need up-to-the-second data on
|
||||
stock prices. Or you've got a dashboard with some kind of real-time
|
||||
monitoring chart, whatever it's measuring, and you want to keep it up to date
|
||||
with a minimum of overhead. Pub/sub is a powerful concept, which is why
|
||||
people keep re-implementing it. Like I'm doing here. Get over it.
|
||||
|
||||
## But why can't I just use SocketIO for this, again?
|
||||
|
||||
I mean, you _can._ But SocketIO does so much _more_ than simple pub/sub.
|
||||
Connection multiplexing, automatic reconnects, receipt acknowledgements, the
|
||||
list goes on. All of these features are great if, again, you are implementing
|
||||
an instant messenger. They even have a feature called "rooms," which mentions
|
||||
in its documentation that it "makes it easy to implement private messages,"
|
||||
among other things, so it's pretty clear who their target is.
|
||||
|
||||
And it's a great target! Lots of people need instant messaging. Every website
|
||||
in the world seems to pop up a bubble saying "Hi, I'm [friendly-sounding
|
||||
name]! Do you want to talk about giving us money?" 30 seconds after you hit
|
||||
their page. Everyone with a customer-service team has discovered or will soon
|
||||
discover that most issues are easier to resolve over text than over the
|
||||
phone, especially if your CS is outsourced to some foriegn country so your
|
||||
reps all have an accent. SocketIO exists for a reason, and it's a very good
|
||||
reason, and if that's what you need then go for it, knock yourself out.
|
||||
|
||||
But if all you need is a simple event stream with pub/sub semantics, then keep
|
||||
reading, because that's what I want to talk about.
|
||||
|
||||
## Fine. Make your pitch, I'll listen.
|
||||
|
||||
The protocol I'm imagining should solve three basic problems:
|
||||
* Authentication
|
||||
* Connection management (keepalive, automatic reconnects)
|
||||
* ...and the actual pub/sub itself, of course.
|
||||
|
||||
Let's go through each of these in turn.
|
||||
|
||||
### Authentication
|
||||
|
||||
The protocol purists might start to set up a bit of a racket here. Ignore
|
||||
those guys, they suck. Listen, every web-based protocol in the world should
|
||||
at least be _aware_ of the question of authentication. Maybe the awareness
|
||||
should stop at "that's being handled so I don't need to think about it," but
|
||||
at least that much is pretty necessary. I don't know exactly how much Web
|
||||
traffic is authenticated vs. unauthenticated (ask Cloudflare, they might) but
|
||||
according to some quick Googling an Akamai bigwig said in 2019 that 83% of
|
||||
the traffic they see is API traffic. I imagine that API traffic is
|
||||
overwhelmingly authenticated, and when you factor in the fact that a large
|
||||
part of the rest is social media, which is also going to be
|
||||
mostly-authenticated, I imagine you'll end up with somewhere between "a whole
|
||||
lot" and "the vast majority."
|
||||
|
||||
So you need authentication, and websockets don't give it to you. Well, they
|
||||
leave it open, kinda - RFC 6455 says that the websocket opening handshake
|
||||
(which starts with an HTTP request) can include
|
||||
|
||||
> Optionally, other header
|
||||
fields, such as those used to send cookies or request authentication to a
|
||||
server.
|
||||
|
||||
But in practice, this still kinda sucks. It sucks because you can't
|
||||
have _one_ authentication method that's dead-simple and works for everybody.
|
||||
Either you're coming from the browser, in which case you're stuck with
|
||||
session cookies or URL params and that's it, or you're coming from some kind
|
||||
of scripting environment where you'd love to be able to just stick a bearer
|
||||
token in the `Authorization` header like everybody else does, but that's not
|
||||
how the browser does it so tough luck.
|
||||
|
||||
The only solution that works easily with all clients is to put the
|
||||
auth in a URL param. So let's just do that. Unfortunately, that creates a new
|
||||
issue: we can't just use a plain bearer token any more, because now it's in
|
||||
the URL and URL's go all sorts of places - server logs, CDNs, browser address
|
||||
bars, etc. Probably the best thing to do here is to simply sign the URL
|
||||
[a la AWS](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/RESTAuthentication.html#RESTAuthenticationQueryStringAuth).
|
||||
Fortunately, since we're only dealing with a very specific type of request,
|
||||
we don't need to bother with the authenticated headers business that AWS
|
||||
does.
|
||||
|
||||
The browser has very limited capabilities when it comes to modifying the request, so we should probably stick to a signature that can be included directly in the URL as a couple of querystring params.
|
18
src/routes/all.json.js
Normal file
18
src/routes/all.json.js
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
const posts = import.meta.globEager('./_posts/*.svx');
|
||||
export let postData = [];
|
||||
|
||||
for (const path in posts) {
|
||||
const urlPath = path.slice(8, -4)
|
||||
posts[path].metadata.path = urlPath;
|
||||
postData.push(posts[path].metadata);
|
||||
}
|
||||
postData.sort((a, b) => {
|
||||
// sorting in reverse, so we flip the intuitive order
|
||||
if (a.date > b.date) return -1;
|
||||
if (a.date < b.date) return 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
export async function get() {
|
||||
return {body: postData};
|
||||
}
|
11
src/routes/index.js
Normal file
11
src/routes/index.js
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
import { postData } from './all.json.js';
|
||||
const path = postData[0].path;
|
||||
|
||||
export async function get({ host }) {
|
||||
const resp = await fetch(`http://${host}${path}`);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
status: resp.status,
|
||||
headers: {'Content-Type': 'text/html'},
|
||||
body: await resp.text()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
37
src/routes/posts.svelte
Normal file
37
src/routes/posts.svelte
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
<script context="module">
|
||||
export async function load({ page, fetch }) {
|
||||
const resp = await fetch(`http://${page.host}/all.json`);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
props: {
|
||||
postData: await resp.json()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
|
||||
<script>
|
||||
export let postData;
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
|
||||
<style>
|
||||
#posts {
|
||||
text-align: center;
|
||||
margin-top: 1.25rem;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.post-link {
|
||||
text-decoration: none;
|
||||
}
|
||||
.post-link:hover {
|
||||
text-decoration: underline;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
|
||||
<div id="posts">
|
||||
<h1>All Posts</h1>
|
||||
{#each postData as post}
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
<a class="post-link" href="{post.path}"><h3>{post.title}</h3></a>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
{/each}
|
||||
</div>
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user