Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Spriteandclaude 5fbc597cbc docs: record wave 4 acceptance and what it left undone
Wave 4 is verified complete. Also records the two mechanisms that stopped F3
from reporting (the 600s background-task ceiling in `claude -p`, then the quota
wait) so the next worker launch does not repeat it, and flags the one thing
wave 4 owed and never delivered: nobody has looked at the fourteen new
screenshots.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014TyzeWmdTqi7U85iYNGy7P
2026-09-08 21:28:43 +00:00
Spriteandclaude 0f47ee917f orchestration: run workers as a sprite service; record wave 4 completion
setsid nohup did not survive orchestrator teardown on 09-06 (uptime was
continuous, so this was a teardown kill, not the hazard-#5 suspend).
tasks/service-worker.sh runs a worker under the sprite service supervisor
instead, which both outlives the orchestrator and holds the box awake, making
the task-lease guard redundant. It is sentinel-guarded so a supervisor restart
does not re-run a finished wave, and it stops its own service afterwards so the
sprite can suspend.

logs/WAVE4-DONE records that F3's files were all complete but the worker was
stuck re-running verification it could not finish, so the orchestrator ran the
verification itself and accepted the work. F3's own written report — including
the design critique of the rendered screens it was asked for — was never
produced; that gap is recorded in the sentinel.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014TyzeWmdTqi7U85iYNGy7P
2026-09-08 21:28:18 +00:00
Spriteandclaude 5455df2d61 Wave 4 (F3): settings email, five screens' screenshots, release signing, README
Completes wave 4. Verified by the orchestrator, not self-reported:
assembleDebug / testDebugUnitTest / assembleRelease all exit 0;
102 tests, 1 skipped, 0 failures, 0 errors.

- Settings showed the PocketBase user id instead of the signed-in email,
  because login never persisted the email. AuthRepository now writes it to
  SettingsStore on success and sign-out clears it; SettingsUiState carries
  userEmail in place of userId. AuthRepositoryTest asserts both directions.
- Paparazzi coverage for the five screens library was missing: setup, detail,
  scan, locations, settings, each light + dark, populated rather than empty.
  Scan cannot show a live camera under Paparazzi, so its tests render the
  reticle overlay and the result bottom sheet over a static backdrop.
- Release signing via an optional gitignored app/keystore.properties. Without
  it assembleRelease still works and comes out debug-signed, so the build is
  not owner-only. R8 deliberately left off; nothing has proven Room, Retrofit,
  kotlinx-serialization and ML Kit survive it.
- Top-level README: shared-library model, offline-first architecture, the
  push-then-pull last-write-wins conflict rule SPEC requires be documented
  here, build/deploy/install steps, and honest current limitations.

The signed APK and the keystore are intentionally not committed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014TyzeWmdTqi7U85iYNGy7P
2026-09-08 21:28:11 +00:00